The following SQL extract is from the delivered Global Payroll GPGB_EDI process (although I have already made some minor changes, and PS_GP_RSLT_PIN is partitioned). Notice that each sub-query joins two tables together. PS_GP_RSLT_PIN is second largest of Global Payroll result tables. PS_GP_PIN is a look-up table, and the criterion on PIN_CODE will only return a single row.
UPDATE Table(GPGB_EDIE_TMP) X SET X.GPGB_WK53_IND = ( SELECT %TrimSubstr(%Sql(FUNCLIB_HR_CHAR,A.CALC_RSLT_VAL),1,2) FROM PS_GP_RSLT_PIN A ,PS_GP_PIN B WHERE A.EMPLID = %Table(GPGB_EDIE_TMP).EMPLID ...
AND A.PIN_NUM = B.PIN_NUM AND B.PIN_CODE = 'TAX VR PERIOD GBR' AND A.SLICE_BGN_DT = ( SELECT MAX(D.SLICE_BGN_DT) FROM PS_GP_RSLT_PIN D WHERE D.EMPLID = %Table(GPGB_EDIE_TMP).EMPLID ... AND D.INSTANCE = A.INSTANCE AND D.PIN_NUM = B.PIN_NUM) ... ) WHERE EXISTS ( ... ) AND PROCESS_INSTANCE = %Bind(PROCESS_INSTANCE)
This is part of the initial SQL execution plan. The problem is that the sub-query starts by scanning through the PS_GP_RSLT_PIN table, 4 times because there are three correlated sub-queries, and only at the very end does it look up the PIN_CODE by the PIN_NUM.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 0 | UPDATE STATEMENT | | 1 | 65 | 113M (93)| 39:44:51 | | | 1 | UPDATE | PS_GPGB_EDIE_TMP4 | | | | | | |* 2 | FILTER | | | | | | | |* 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | PS_GPGB_EDIE_TMP4 | 673K| 41M| 9967 (6)| 00:00:13 | | 4 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 108 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | 5 | PARTITION RANGE SINGLE | | 1 | 83 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | KEY | | 6 | PARTITION LIST SINGLE | | 1 | 83 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | KEY | |* 7 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | PS_GP_RSLT_PIN | 1 | 83 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | KEY | | 8 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 72 | | | | | 9 | PARTITION RANGE SINGLE | | 1 | 72 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | KEY | | 10 | PARTITION LIST SINGLE | | 1 | 72 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | KEY | |* 11 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | PS_GP_RSLT_PIN | 1 | 72 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | KEY | | 12 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 83 | | | | | 13 | PARTITION RANGE SINGLE | | 1 | 83 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | KEY | | 14 | PARTITION LIST SINGLE | | 1 | 83 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | KEY | | 15 | FIRST ROW | | 1 | 83 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |* 16 | INDEX RANGE SCAN (MIN/MAX) | PS_GP_RSLT_PIN | 1 | 83 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | 17 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 83 | | | | | 18 | PARTITION RANGE SINGLE | | 1 | 83 | 158 (99)| 00:00:01 | KEY | | 19 | PARTITION LIST SINGLE | | 1 | 83 | 158 (99)| 00:00:01 | KEY | | 20 | FIRST ROW | | 1 | 83 | 158 (99)| 00:00:01 | | |* 21 | INDEX RANGE SCAN (MIN/MAX)| PS_GP_RSLT_PIN | 1 | 83 | 158 (99)| 00:00:01 | KEY | |* 22 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | PSAGP_PIN | 1 | 25 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | | ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It would be much better if we started with the PS_GP_PIN table, looked up the PIN_NUM with the PIN_CODE (there is a suitable index on this column) and used the PIN_NUM value as a part of the lookup on PS_GP_RSLT_PIN (again PIN_CODE is in the unique index on that table).
It is tempting to add LEADING hints to the sub-queries, but such a hint does not work because the hint is not scoped to the sub-query and is considered to be invalid because the entire query cannot start at this point.
The only supported place in the query to add a LEADING hint would be the first query, in this case after the UPDATE keyword.
In this case, I have named the query blocks in the sub-queries with the QB_NAME hint. It is valid to put this hint into the sub-query. Then I added LEADING hints for each sub-query after the UPDATE keyword, but I specified their scope using the name of the sub-query specified in the QB_NAME hint. Each sub-query must now start with the PS_GP_PIN table.
UPDATE /*+LEADING(@SUB1 B@SUB1) LEADING(@SUB2 B@SUB2)*/ %Table(GPGB_EDIE_TMP) X SET X.GPGB_WK53_IND = ( SELECT /*+QB_NAME(SUB1)*/ %TrimSubstr(%Sql(FUNCLIB_HR_CHAR,A.CALC_RSLT_VAL),1,2) FROM PS_GP_RSLT_PIN A ,PS_GP_PIN B WHERE A.EMPLID = %Table(GPGB_EDIE_TMP).EMPLID ... AND A.PIN_NUM = B.PIN_NUM AND B.PIN_CODE = 'TAX VR PERIOD GBR' AND A.SLICE_BGN_DT = ( SELECT MAX(D.SLICE_BGN_DT) FROM PS_GP_RSLT_PIN D WHERE D.EMPLID = %Table(GPGB_EDIE_TMP).EMPLID ... AND D.INSTANCE = A.INSTANCE AND D.PIN_NUM = B.PIN_NUM) ... ) WHERE EXISTS ( SELECT /*+QB_NAME(SUB2)*/ 'X' FROM PS_GP_RSLT_PIN A1 ,PS_GP_PIN B1 WHERE A1.EMPLID = %Table(GPGB_EDIE_TMP).EMPLID ... AND A1.PIN_NUM = B1.PIN_NUM AND B1.PIN_CODE = 'TAX VR PERIOD GBR' ... ) AND PROCESS_INSTANCE = %Bind(PROCESS_INSTANCE)
This is the new execution plan. The sub-query starts with an access of index PSAGP_PIN (which leads on PIN_CODE) on PS_GP_PIN, and then does the lookups on PS_GP_RSLT_PIN. The cost is the same, but the execution time was considerably reduced.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 0 | UPDATE STATEMENT | | 1 | 65 | 113M (93)| 39:44:51 | | | 1 | UPDATE | PS_GPGB_EDIE_TMP4 | | | | | | |* 2 | FILTER | | | | | | | |* 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | PS_GPGB_EDIE_TMP4 | 673K| 41M| 9967 (6)| 00:00:13 | | | 4 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 108 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |* 5 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | PSAGP_PIN | 1 | 25 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | 6 | PARTITION RANGE SINGLE | | 1 | 83 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | KEY | | 7 | PARTITION LIST SINGLE | | 1 | 83 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | KEY | |* 8 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | PS_GP_RSLT_PIN | 1 | 83 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | KEY | | 9 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 72 | | | | | 10 | PARTITION RANGE SINGLE | | 1 | 72 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | KEY | | 11 | PARTITION LIST SINGLE | | 1 | 72 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | KEY | |* 12 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | PS_GP_RSLT_PIN | 1 | 72 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | KEY | | 13 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 83 | | | | | 14 | PARTITION RANGE SINGLE | | 1 | 83 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | KEY | | 15 | PARTITION LIST SINGLE | | 1 | 83 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | KEY | | 16 | FIRST ROW | | 1 | 83 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |* 17 | INDEX RANGE SCAN (MIN/MAX) | PS_GP_RSLT_PIN | 1 | 83 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | 18 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 83 | | | | | 19 | PARTITION RANGE SINGLE | | 1 | 83 | 158 (99)| 00:00:01 | KEY | | 20 | PARTITION LIST SINGLE | | 1 | 83 | 158 (99)| 00:00:01 | KEY | | 21 | FIRST ROW | | 1 | 83 | 158 (99)| 00:00:01 | | |* 22 | INDEX RANGE SCAN (MIN/MAX)| PS_GP_RSLT_PIN | 1 | 83 | 158 (99)| 00:00:01 | KEY | | 23 | TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID | PS_GP_RSLT_PIN | 1 | 86 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 comment :
Hi,
I tried the above technique in the following query. However, it doesn't work.
update /*+ leading(@sub kit@sub) */ps_prod_item set eff_status = 'A' where (setid, product_id ) in
(select /*+ QB_NAME(sub)*/ kit.setid, kit.product_id from ps_prod_item pit
join ps_prodkit_comps kit on kit.setid = pit.setid and kit.prod_component_id = pit.product_id
where pit.setid = 'COM03' and pit.product_id = 'T01135'
and (kit.setid, kit.product_id) in (
select setid, product_id_alt from ps_prod_relations where setid = 'COM03' and product_id = 'SWE_CONS_SERVICE'
and prod_rel_type = 'SF'))
Note that putting the hint in the subquery itself works perfectly. Tested for both 10g and 11g versions of Oracle
Post a Comment